The best part of conferences is usually the networking, schmoozing and socializing that happens between the formal sessions. Definitely true here. Reconnected with more people I've known for a long time - Doug Block (who's new film 51 Birch Street has gotten rave previews; my old pal Liz Ogilvie from Docuclub days, now with the distributor Docurama...a whole bunch more.
The funniest reconnection was with the ex-boyfriend of a friend I last saw a dozen years ago. He literally stopped me in my tracks in front of the Puck Building, blurted out my name and gave me an affectionate hug. Thing is, I didn't recognize the guy. At first. But then we caught up and it was real nice. Steve lives in Asheville, NC now, a place I'd like to visit. He's a producer and has all these projects in the pipeline. (By the way, after all these years, I still really don't understand how any independent producers make money or can juggle all these projects. I'm overwhelmed with one.)
I entered three sessions but only stayed for one, The Art of Editing, with an all-star lineup: Larry Silk, Chris Hegedus and D.A. Pennebaker, Paula Heredia, Susan Froemke, Megan Cunningham. Nothing revelatory but the presenters were charming and smart. Comments noted:
"For a complex film, figure it's gonna take 8 months minimum"
"It's a constant struggle"
"It's an enormous responsibility to make a film about a real person"
"You should budget to shoot some more after you begin editing"
How to choose an editor? Work with someone who:
"....you communicate with well, who you feel at ease with. You can fight and disagree, like sisters and brothers, but in the end you listen to and respect each other."
"...is graceful with the craft of editing."
"....can help you figure out the structure, the story. Ask them how they do that."
After hearing these top editors talk about how hard it is, I feel kind of validated - like, it's par for the course, we're all in this together. I can go to funders and say - hey, it took these Oscar winning docs a year and $100,000 to get it right, they went through editors and four rough cuts....
On other hand, it leaves me feeling uneasy, even disheartened. Does it HAVE to be this long and hard? It would be nice to hear a filmmaker or editor say "you know, the editing went really great, it was fun, fulfilling, and we came in under budget!"
As for the other two sessions I entered - Distributing Docs and Finding Funding - I stayed just a few minutes for both. I'd heard the presenters and their talks before. Which in some sense is also validating - I know this stuff. The funding session kind of pushed my buttons though. Same presenters from the same handful of foundations that always show up at these conferences, that give grants to about .001% of applicants. Sure there's some bitter grapes here 'cause I haven't gotten any money from them! But hey, why not present some coaching and case studies from producers who've raised money from other sources? I'm doing it, plenty others are too.